![]() |
![]() |
[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ] |
Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi |
2025, Cilt 39, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 022-029 |
[ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ] |
Relationship Between Foot and Hoof Lesions Seen in the East of the Küçük Menderes River Basin and the Lameness Score |
Kadri KULUALP1, İbrahim AKIN2, Yalçın Alper ÖZTURAN2, Pelin Fatoş POLAT DİNÇER3, Ender DİNÇER4 |
1Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı, İzmir, TÜRKİYE 2Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı, Aydın, TÜRKİYE 3Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, İç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı, İzmir, TÜRKİYE 4Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Viroloji Ana Bilim Dalı, İzmir, TÜRKİYE |
Keywords: Foot diseases, hoof diseases, lameness, dairy cattle |
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of foot and claw lesions and their association with
lameness scores in 1.685 dairy cattle, including 1.322 Holstein and 363 Simmental breeds, across
11 different farms located in the eastern part of the Küçük Menderes River Basin. The relationship
between claw lesions and lameness was evaluated using the Chi-square test. Lesions were
observed in 365 Holstein cattle (27.6%) and 97 Simmental cattle (26.72%). The three most
common lesions in both breeds were digital dermatitis, sole ulcer, and white line disease.
Lameness was observed in 123 Holstein cattle and 43 Simmental cattle with lesions. Lameness
was most frequently associated with heel erosion, sole hemorrhage, and white line disease. In
Holstein cattle, significant differences were found in lameness scores between affected and
unaffected animals: heel erosion (0 vs. 2), sole hemorrhage (0 vs. 1, and 0 vs. 2), sole ulcer (0 vs.
1, 0 vs. 2, 0 vs. 3, and 1 vs. 3), white line disease (0 vs. 1 and 0 vs. 2), and digital dermatitis (0 vs.
other scores) (p<0.05). Similarly, for Simmental cattle, significant differences were noted: heel
erosion (0 vs. 2), sole hemorrhage (0 vs. 3), sole ulcer (0 vs. 2, 0 vs. 3, and 1 vs. 3), white line
disease (0 vs. 1), and digital dermatitis (0 vs. other scores) (p<0.05). The findings suggest that
infectious lesions are widespread, while non-infectious lesions are associated with higher lameness
rates. The relationship between lesions and lameness scores may vary by breed.
|
[ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ] |
![]() |
[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ] |