![]() |
![]() |
| [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ] | |
| Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi |
| 2025, Cilt 39, Sayı 3, Sayfa(lar) 200-206 |
| [ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ] |
| Prevalence, Diversity and Prophylactic Efficacy of Gastrointestinal Parasites in a Zoo in Ankara |
| Halime KARA1, Mustafa GÜVEN2, Sami GÖKPINAR3, Nurperi KESKİN4, Zeynep Begüm BABACAN3, Ebubekir CEYLAN5 |
| 1Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Health Vocational School, Department of Veterinary, Ankara, Türkiye 2 İzmir Bakırçay University, Menemen Vocational School, Department of Veterinary, İzmir, Türkiye 3Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Kırıkkale, TÜRKİYE 4Ankara University, Department of Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara, TÜRKİYE 5Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara, TÜRKİYE |
| Keywords: Antiparasitic treatment, co-infection, gastrointestinal parasites, prevalence, zoo animals |
|
This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, taxonomic diversity, co-infection patterns, and outcomes of routine prophylactic practices for gastrointestinal parasites in avian and mammalian species housed in a zoo in Ankara. A total of 272 fresh fecal samples were collected and examined using flotation and sedimentation techniques. Associations with class and sex were analyzed using Chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests and logistic regression. The overall positivity rate was 30.5% (95% CI: 25.3–36.2); 35.1% in birds (95% CI: 27.9–43.1) and 25.0% in mammals (95% CI: 18.2–33.3). However, the effect of class was not confirmed in the multivariable model. The most frequent taxon was Eimeria spp. (15.4%), while strongylid-type eggs, Capillaria spp., Ascaridia spp., and Nematodirus spp. were detected at lower rates. Co-infections were common, with Eimeria spp. occupying a central position within the network. Routine antiparasitic treatments yielded marked benefits against nematode targets, with fecal negativity reaching 83.5% in treated animals, 82.9% with ivermectin, and 100% with selamectin in a small sample. Nevertheless, Eimeria burden persisted, highlighting the need for concurrent anticoccidial treatment and environmental interventions such as litter and moisture control. The findings support the critical importance of regular fecal parasitological surveillance tailored to taxonomic class and species, along with combination prophylaxis, for welfare improvement and infection control in zoo settings.
|
| [ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ] |
![]() |
| [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ] |