PCR amplification of the relevant region of the IGF1R gene resulted in amplicons of 206 base pairs in length (Figure
1). Following digestion of the obtained amplicons with the RsaI restriction enzyme, individuals with the BB genotype showed two bands at 139 and 67 base pairs in length; individuals with the AB genotype showed three bands at 206, 139, and 67 base pairs in length; while individuals with the AA genotype showed a single band at 206 base pairs in length (Figure
2).
Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın |
Figure 1: Electrophoretic pattern of the PCR amplicons, which are 206 base pairs in length in the IGF1R gene, M: 100 bp DNA Ladder |
Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın |
Figure 2: Electrophoretic pattern of RFLP fragments for IGF1R-RsaI polymorphism, AA: 206 bp, BB: 139, 67 bp, AB: 206, 139, 67 bp, M: 100 bp DNA Ladder |
The analysis revealed that the AB genotype (0.49) was the most prevalent genotype, while the AA genotype (0.20) was the least common genotype. The analyses of the population indicated that the B allele (0.56) exhibited the highest prevalence among alleles, as shown in Table 1. Akkaraman lambs were found not to be in Hardy-Weinberg equi
Correlations of genotypes according to live weights at different growth times are given in Table 2. When analyzing the relationship between birth type (single or twin) and IGF1R genotypes, distinct effects of different genotypes on birth weight and subsequent live weights were observed. The study identified and statistically supported differences in weight gain based on the AA, AB, and BB genotypes of lambs, alongside their birth types. For single-born lambs, weight differences based on genotypes were noted. The average birth weights for AA, AB, and BB genotypes were recorded as 4557 g, 4617 g, and 4644 g, respectively. For twin-born lambs, AA genotype lambs weighed 4750 g, while AB genotype lambs weighed 4621 g at birth. Despite these differences, the variations in birth weight were not statistically significant (p>0.05). At 30 days, the average weight of single-born AA genotype lambs was 12.503 g, while AB and BB genotype lambs had average weights of 12.505 g and 12.156 g, respectively. For twin-born lambs, AA genotype lambs reached an average weight of 12.972 g, and AB genotype lambs weighed 13.170 g. However, the differences in 30-day weights between genotypes were also not statistically significant (p=0.5398). By day 60, the average weight of single-born AA genotype lambs was 22.281 g, while AB genotype lambs weighed 21.591 g, and BB genotype lambs reached 21.004 g. For twin-born lambs, AA genotype lambs averaged 22.523 g, while AB genotype lambs weighed 22.344 g. As with previous periods, the differences in 60-day weights were not statistically significant (p>0.05). At 90 days, single-born AA genotype lambs reached an average weight of 33.023 g, AB genotype lambs 31.809 g, and BB genotype lambs 31.637 g. For twin-born lambs, AA genotype lambs weighed 33.909 g, and AB genotype lambs reached 31.500 g. Again, there were no statistically significant differences between the 90-day weights of different genotypes (p>0.05).
A GLM analysis was performed to analyze the impact on birth weight and the weights at the 30th, 60th, and 90th days based on the data reported in Table 3. All models were computed via the highest likelihood technique. The farm factor exerted the most substantial influence on birth weight (LogWorth=19.047, p<0.0001). Furthermore, the weight at 30 days markedly affected the delivery weight (LogWorth=2.250, p=0.0056). The effects of the allele, 60th day weight, birth type, and 90th day weight were not statistically significant. The model was substantially affected by the farm variable (p<0.0001), but the allele variable exhibited questionable significance. The parameter estimates revealed that the AB allele exerted a favorable influence (estimate=108.133, p=0.0472), whereas the AA allele was not statistically significant (estimate=-86.806, p=0.2740). The farm component was found to be significant for the weight on the 30th day (LogWorth=22.602, p<0.0001). Alleles, birth type, and 90th-day weight were not significant in the model; however, birth weight was significant. The parameter estimates revealed that the weight on the 30th day was strongly influenced by farm 1 (estimate=-1004.637, p<0.0001), whereas farm 3 exerted a considerable positive effect (estimate=1199.090, p<0.0001). The AA allele was not significant, whereas the AB allele (estimate=-162.642, p=0.0882) exhibited marginal significance. For the weight at day 60, the weight at day 30 was the most important variable (LogWorth=38.125, p<0.0001), and the farm factor was also noteworthy (LogWorth=22.602, p<0.0001). Birth weight, allele, and birth type were found to be statistically insignificant. The AB allele had a positive and significant influence on parameter estimates (estimate=218.564, p=0.0309), while the AA allele was not significant (estimate=11.042, p=0.9404). The farm component exerted a substantial influence (LogWorth=9.260, p<0.0001), with the weight on the 60th day identified as the most important variable affecting the weight on the 90th day (LogWorth=55.143, p<0.0001). The model indicated that birth type (LogWorth=0.856, p=0.1394), allele (LogWorth=0.697, p=0.2010), and 30th-day weight (LogWorth=0.107, p=0.7818) were not statistically significant. According to parameter estimates, Farm 1 exhibited a positive and substantial influence (estimate=1244.934, p<0.0001), whereas Farm 3 demonstrated a negative and significant impact (estimate=-1343.843, p<0.0001). The AB allele showed a marginally significant negative impact (estimate=-297.512, p=0.0755).
Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın |
Table 3: Generalized Linear Model (GLM) Results for the Effect of IGF1R Farm, Genotypes and Birth Weight on the Live Weights of Akkaraman Lambs |
The study conducted on the Akkaraman population revealed a higher prevalence of the BB genotype among lambs with a single birth type, as indicated in Table 4.