OX is a widely used broad-spectrum anthelmintic that is used to treat and prevent gastrointestinal parasites in livestock animals, such as pigs, sheep, and cattle. While it is effective against parasites, like many medications, it can also have unintended side effects and potential toxicities. Some of the potential adverse effects of OX include liver damage, gastrointestinal disturbances, and hypersensitivity reactions
21,22.
The 38th session of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives (JECFA) reported that OX decreased the levels of connexin 32, a protein crucial for gap junctional intercellular communication, which serves as a biological marker for tissues that have been exposed to tumor-promoting agents. Furthermore, it was observed that it increased the number of hepatocellular foci that were positive for the placental variant of GST, a novel preneoplastic marker linked to chemical carcinogens23,24. The results suggest that OX facilitates tumor development in the rat liver through a non-genotoxic or indirectly genotoxic mechanism, as it does not demonstrate the mutagenic potential observed in short-term genotoxicity assessments23; however, the exact molecular mechanism underlying this activity is still unknown25.
Repeated administration of benzimidazole-derived anthelmintics, specifically mebendazole and albendazole, has been documented to induce an imbalance in glutathione homeostasis and liver toxicity in rat models26. The results indicate that oxidative stress could be a contributing factor in the carcinogenesis of rats induced by FEN and OX. Although OX is not thought to have carcinogenic potential in rats and mice, it has been emphasized that OX may have tumor-promoting potential in rats. Thus, acceptable daily intake levels (0–7 μg/kg/gün) have been determined for OX and many other benzimidazole derivative anthelmintic drugs. However, although the mechanisms underlying the tumor-promoting activity of OX in rats have not yet been elucidated, administration of OX above the therapeutic dose and at a frequency exceeding the therapeutic dose may disrupt the oxidative balance and lead to lipid peroxidation1,3,5,26.
Oxygen is present in the liver due to enzymatic activities. Oxygen can cause oxidative stress during metabolism and activity, which can result in a disparity exists between the capacity of the body to resist ROS and the rate at which they are manufactured. The body has a sophisticated antioxidant defense system that comprises a number of antioxidant enzymes that are essential for preserving cellular redox balance in order to combat the damaging effects of ROS. In response to increased ROS production induced by OX, the body's defense mechanisms are triggered22,27,28. Certain research indicates that OX may influence both the expression and functionality of antioxidant defence enzymes, either by promoting their synthesis or inhibiting their function, depending on the specific tissue and dosage. OX may interfere with the body's inherent mechanisms for antioxidant defense, depleting the levels of antioxidants like GSH, SOD and CAT. Reduced antioxidant capacity can lead to increased ROS accumulation and oxidative damage27-29. The relationship between OX and antioxidants involves a complex interplay. OX has the potential to provoke oxidative stress, which in turn activates antioxidant response mechanisms and enhances the activity of various antioxidant defence enzymes27,28. However, the drug's impact on the activity of these enzymes and its tissue-specific effects require further investigation.
In the present study, the increase in MDA levels observed in the OX-treated group can be explained by the mechanism by which OX causes cell damage by causing lipid peroxidation in cells. The present study also showed that a significant increase in oxidative stress was accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in the activities of enzymes involved in the removal of superoxide anions and peroxides, namely CAT and SOD, and their related enzymes (GSH-Px). The significant increase observed in plasma MDA levels in OX-treated animals showed that OX leads to the formation of high levels of free radicals that cannot be tolerated by the cellular antioxidant defense system. This significant decrease in enzyme activities can be explained by the consumption of free radicals during their conversion to less harmful or harmless metabolites. It can be explained as the increase in the activity of GSH-Px due to the insufficient conversion of GSH, which is the substrate, to GSSG.
These findings suggest that ROS production is involved in the cellular tumor promotion of OX and strongly support previous studies28,30.
Vegetable artichokes (Cynara scolymus) are well-known for their possible health advantages, which include liver support and antioxidant qualities. Artichoke contains compounds like cynarin and silymarin, which are believed to have hepatoprotective effects. However, there is no established evidence to suggest that artichoke can directly counteract or mitigate OX induced damage. The potential liver-protective properties of artichoke are more commonly studied in the context of liver disorders and toxicity caused by factors like alcohol consumption, drug use, and exposure to environmental toxins9-14,31.
Because artichokes are rich in antioxidants, including flavonoids, polyphenols, and cynarin, their potential effects on oxidative stress have been researched. Antioxidants are compounds that assist in neutralizing detrimental entities known as free radicals, which can lead to cellular oxidative stress and damage. Oxidative stress comes out when there is a disparity between the concentration of free radicals and the body's ability to neutralize them via antioxidants. It is associated with various health conditions, including inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer. The potential effects of artichoke on oxidative stress have been investigated in both animal and human studies. Artichoke extracts have demonstrated strong antioxidant properties in vitro and animal studies. These antioxidants help scavenge free radicals, minimizing oxidative harm to cells and tissues9-14,31.
Artichoke extracts have been shown to protect the many tissues from oxidative stress and damage in animal models9,13,14,31. They may enhance the activity of antioxidant enzymes, leading to improved detoxification and reduced oxidative damage.
In the present study, it was observed that MDA levels were lower in the groups applied artichoke for both therapeutic and preventive purposes compared to the group applied OX, and this can be explained as artichoke eliminates the possibility of oxidative stress caused by OX application in rats. Artichoke as a treatment for rats treated with OX may be effective in significantly increasing CAT and GSH-Px activities. Artichoke reduced the increased GSH levels, caused an increase in the decreased SOD activity and thus prevented the harmful effects of superoxide radicals. When the results are examined, it was observed that some parameters (CAT and GSH-Px) in the artichoke group applied for preventive purposes did not change as much as in the artichoke group applied for therapeutic purposes. This can be explained as the oxidative effects of OX applied after artichoke occurred rapidly and were higher than the antioxidant effects of artichoke. It can be thought that artichoke achieves all of this by neutralizing harmful entities known as free radicals, which can cause cellular oxidative stress and damage, with antioxidants such as flavonoids, polyphenols and cynarin in its content. Artichoke can prevent free radical formation by directly cleaning free radicals and then converting antioxidant species into less toxic products.
In conclusion, OX, like many drugs, has the potential to induce oxidative stress, which can lead to cellular damage. While artichoke is known for its potential hepatoprotective properties, there is currently no scientific evidence to support its specific role in counteracting OX induced damage.