[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi
2009, Cilt 23, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 001-004
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
Tavuklardan İzole Edilen Escherichia Coli Suşlarının Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analizi İle Tiplendirilmesi
Ayşe KILIÇ1, Adile MUZ2, Hasan Basri ERTAŞ2, Gökben ÖZBEY3
1Fırat Üniversitesi, Sivrice Meslek Yüksekokulu, Elazığ, TÜRKİYE
2Fırat Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Elazığ,TÜRKİYE
3Fırat Üniversitesi, Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Elazığ, TÜRKİYE
Anahtar Kelimeler: E.coli, RAPD, tavuk, PZR
Özet
Bu çalışmada, colibacillosis şüpheli farklı kanatlı işletmelerinden 48 E.coli suşu izole ve identifiye edildi. Suşların kanlı agara ekimleri yapıldıktan sonra, EMB ve MacConkey agara ekimleri yapıldı.110 örneğin bakteriyel kültürü sonucunda 48 (%13,6)'i E.coli olarak identifiye edildi. Bu bölgedeki E.coli soyları arasındaki genetik farklılıkları tespit etmek için RAPD metodu uygulandı. 48 E.coli izolatından ekstrakte edilen DNA'lar RAPD primer (COL 1) ile çoğaltıldı. RAPD analizinden dokuz farklı profil elde edildi. Bu sonuçlar bu bölgedeki E.coli soyları arasında büyük bir genetik farklılık olduğunu gösterdi. RAPD metodunun E.coli soylarını tiplendirmede yüksek oranda ayırıcı olduğu görüldü. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma; RAPD metodunun hem kolay hem de daha hızlı olmasından ötürü, E.coli'nin moleküler epidemiyolojisinin çalışılmasında, yüksek oranda etkili bir metod olduğunu gösterdi.
  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    Esherichia coli infections are a significant concern to the poultry industry. E.coli is a common inhabitant of the gastrointestinal tract of most animals, including birds, but not all E.coli isolates are capable of causing disease1 . Avian pathogenic E.coli strains (APEC) cause several disease syndromes in farmed birds such as peritonitis2, enteritis3, airsacculitis, pericarditis, perihepatitis, salpingitis, synovitis, panophtalmitis2-5 and swollen head syndrome6 . The serological and bacteriological methods for typing microbes are often limited to a few select reference laboratories. Such typing precedures are not sensitive enough to further differentiate bacterial isolates. Bacterial isolates including E.coli can be differentiated into genetically distinct isolates using procedures that identify differences in the genetic composition of a microbial population. These techniques involve multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE)7 , pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)8, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)9, bacterial restriction endonuclease digest analysis (BRENDA)10, or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis by either Southern blot or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)10.

    Most pathogenic E.coli avian isolates cannot be distinguished biochemically from the normal commensals inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract of birds. Diagnosis of E.coli infection currently relies on the phenotypic differentiation of pathogenic strains from nonpathogenic normal flora. Phenotypic differentiation methods can be time-consuming and complicated and are not routinely used in many clinical laboratories. Genotypic diagnosis may be accomplished by DNA colony blot hibridization to identify genes encoding virulence factors11. Howewer, the use of radioactive isotopes and need for more time make this method unsuitable for many diagnostic laboratories.

    Various genotypic methods have been proven useful for species identification, epidemiological typing and determining the genetic relatedness among pathogenic and nonpathogenic bacteria12,13.

    Genotyping of E.coli strains may aid in defining those that are specifically pathogenic for a certain host, and give guidance for epidemiological studies of sources of infection, and disease transmission. Using a molecular approach, arbitrary amplification of polymorphic DNA sequences, termed random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis on arbitrarily primed PCR (APPCR) typing,9,13 is one such new technique that is being used in many epidemiological studies. It is a fast, PCR based method of genetic typing based on genomic polymorphisms.

    The purpose of the present study was to investigate the genetic differences in local E.coli isolates from colibacillosis suspicious hens.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    Samples: In this study, a total of 110 intestinal organ samples, were collected from different broiler flocks. The samples were immediately transferred to laboratory where they were processed.

    Culture: The samples were inoculated on sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar. Identification was based on biochemical tests, including hydrogen sulphide, citrate, urease and indole production14. E.coli strains were stored in tryptone soy broth (Oxoid, Hamsphire, UK) with 15% glycerol at -70ºC.

    RAPD analysis: A random COL-1 primer (3'-AAG AGC CCG T-5') (İontek, İstanbul, Türkiye) was used at a concentration of 1µM, according to the manufacturer's instructions24.

    DNA Extraction: Selected E.coli colonies were transferred into eppendorf tube containing 300µl distilled water. The tube was vortexed and incubated at 56º C for 30 min in boiling water bath. After suspension was added in 300 µl K buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0+ 150 mM NaCl + 10 mM EDTA+ %0.2 SDS) and 200 µg/ml proteinase K, incubate at 37º C for 2 h in boiling-water bath. Following incubation, mixture was boiled 30 min and vortexed. An equal volume of phenol was added to the suspension which was shaken vigorously by hand for 5 min and then, centrifuged at 11600 g for 10 min. The upper phase was transferred into a new eppendorf tube. Genomic DNA was precipitated with absolute ethanol and 0.3 M Na- Acetate at -20ºC for one hour or overnight. The pellet was washed twice with 300µl 90% and 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 11600 g for 5 min. The pellet was dried and suspensed in 50 µl distilled water and used target DNA in PCR.

    Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) based on RAPD analysis: In RAPD analysis of E.coli strains, the reaction mixture was prepared in a total volume of 50µl consisting of 5µl template DNA, 10xPCR buffer (750 mM Tris HCl, 200 mM (NH4)SO4, 0.1 Tween 20), 3.5 mM MgCl2, 200ul deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (fermentas, Lithuania), and 1µM COL-1 primer (3'-AAG AGC CCGT-5'). The samples were amplified through 45 cycles at 30 s, 94ºC, 15 s, 36ºC, and 30s, 72ºC. In negative control reactions, the DNA template or the primer was replaced by sterile deionized water. RAPD products were visualized by means of ethidium bromide staining after electrophoresis in a 1,5% agarose gel with TBE buffer. Gel was photographed by polaroid gel cam and images were scanned and transferrred to computer for detailed analysis.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    E.coli was isolated from 48 (13,6%) of 110 samples. An example of the electrophoretic profiles generated by RAPD analysis using COL-1 primer of E.coli isolates from chickens is shown in Figure 1. Nine different band profiles were obtained.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Figure 1: RAPD-PCR profiles of E.coli strains from chickens. M: 1-kb ladder molecular size marker. Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 – profiles

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    Infections with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli cause colibacillosis, an acute and mostly systemic disease resulting in significant economic losses in poultry industry worldwide. Avian colibacillosis is a complex syndrome characterized by multiple organ lesions with airsacculitis and associated pericarditis, perihepatitis and peritonitis being most typical. Environmental factors as well as the constitution of poultry or initial viral infections influence the outcome of avian pathogenic Eschericia coli infections15.

    The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic differences among E.coli isolates from chickens by RAPD. We used RAPD analysis to determine genetic heterogeneity of 48 E.coli strains isolated from chickens. The method was successfully applied to typing E. coli strains. RAPD recognized nine profiles among 48 isolates.

    RAPD analysis uses oligonucleotide primers that amplify certain sections of the genome by PCR to produce identifiable banding patterns, which are useful in strain differentiation16. The procedure has been widely used in a variety of bacteria17-23.

    In RAPD analysis, Maurer et al.(1998) found 16 different RAPD types in 84 % E.coli isolates16. In this study, RAPD recognized nine different profiles among 48% E.coli isolates. In another study, Chansiripornchai et al.(2001) found 50 RAPD types by using two different primers in 55 E.coli strains24. The use of different and more than one RAPD primers may improve differentiation power of RAPD process. Chansiripornchai et al. (2001) used six different primers in their research. The same researchers found from these primers that random primer number 4 gave highest discriminatory power on E.coli strain from different flock24. For this reason random primer number 4 were preferred in this study. All the isolates were successfully typed using RAPD method. Cave et al. (1994) found 28 different patterns among 60 E.coli strains (25). These different patterns may be the result of exposing to different E.coli strains throughout the year.

    The results of this study revealed that avian E.coli genetically very heterogenic. This result is in agreement with results of Chansiripornchai et al. (2001) and Maurer et al. (1998) finding16,24. It is also not uncommon to find more than one E.coli genetic type from the same bird. Similar findings have been reported for E.coli in cattle26, Staphylococcus aureus in dairy cows27, and E.coli in poultry28. Maurer et al (1998) encountered certain E.coli RAPD types throughout the year16. The flocks do not have enough time to develop immunity to the E.coli genetic type due to the brief longevity of broiler and this may cause encountering different E.coli types.

    The results of this study indicated that much genetic heterogeneity exists among E.coli isolates from chickens, and RAPD analysis have been proposed as alternative and used to characterize E. coli isolates from avian origin. The RAPD assay has been proved to have excellent discrimination ability due to the fact that the entire genome is the target in genotyping. Further genotyping studies must be done with strains originating from different sources to prove this implication.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11: 142–201.

    2) Gross WB, Siegel PB. Coliform peritonitis of chickens. Avian Dis 1959; 3: 370-373.

    3) Nagi MS, Mathey WJ. Interaction of Escherichia coli and Eimeria burnetti in chickens. Avian Dis 1972; 16: 864-873.

    4) Piercy DWT, West B. Experimental Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens course of disease induced by inoculation via the air sac route. J Comp Pathol 1976; 203-210.

    5) Gross WB, Domermuth CH. Colibacillosis, isolation and identification of avian pathogens. 2nd Edition American Association of Avian pathology USA, 1980.

    6) Fernandez A, Gazquez A, Mendez A, Mozos E, Jover A. Morphopathology of adenohypophysis of chickens in shock induced by Escherichia coli. Avian Dis 1986; 30: 247-254.

    7) Selander RK, Caugant DA, Ochman H. et al. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873-884.

    8) Romling U, Grouthes D, Heuer T, Tummler B. Physical genome analysis of bacteria. Electrophoresis 1992; 13: 626-631.

    9) Welsh J, Mcclelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 7213- 7218.

    10) Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ. Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and applications. American Society for Microbiology Pres Washington DC 1993.

    11) Maslow JN, Mulligan ME, Arbeit RD. Molecular epidemiology: application of contemporary techniques to the typing of microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17: 153- 164.

    12) Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV. et al. İnterpreting chrosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsedfield gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 2233- 2239.

    13) Williams JGK, Hanafey KM, Rafalski JA, Thagey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic marker. Nucleic Acid Res 1990; 18: 6531- 6535.

    14) Finegold SM, William MJ. Diagnostic Microbiology. 6 th ed London, The CV Mosby Company, 1982; 294- 302.

    15) Ewers C, Janssen T, Wieler LH. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2003; 116 (9-10): 381-395.

    16) Maurer JJ, Lee MD, Lobsinger C et al. Molecular typing of avian Escherichia coli isolates by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Avian Dis 1998; 42: 431-451.

    17) Lam KM, Yamamoto R, Damassa AJ. DNA Diversity among isolates of Campylobacter jejuni detected by PCRbased RAPD fingerprinting. Vet Microbiol 1995; 45: 269-274

    18) Lin AW, Usera MA, Barrett TJ, Goldsby RA. Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to differentiate strains of Salmonella enteritidis. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 870-876.

    19) Chaslus-Dancla E, Lesage-Descauses MC, Leroy-Setrin S. et al. Validation of random amplified polymorphic DNA Assays by ribotyping as tools for epidemiological surveys of Pasteurella from animals. Vet Microbiol 1996; 52: 91-102

    20) Chatellier S, Ramanantsoa C, Harriau P. et al. Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae strains by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 2573- 2579.

    21) Lee MD, Mize MS. RAPD Analysis of serotype 3,4 isolates of Pasteurella multocida. Poult Sci 1997; 76: 147.

    22) Tambic A, Power EGM, Talsania H, Anthony RM, French GL . Analysis of an outbreak of non-phage typeable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by using a randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assay. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 3092- 3097.

    23) Zhang Y, Rajagopalan M, Brown BA. et al. Characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from avian cellulitis. Avian Dis 1995; 39: 116- 124.

    24) Chansiripornchai N, Ramasoota P, Sasipreyajan J, Svenson SB. Differentiation of avian pathogenic Eschrichia coli (APEC) strains by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Vet Microbiol 2001; 80: 75- 83.

    25) Cave H, Bingen E, Elion J, Denamur, E. Differentiation of Esherichica coli strains using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Res Microbiol 1994; 145: 141-150

    26) Beutin L, Geier D, Zimmermann S. et al.Epidemiological relatedness and clonal types of natural populations of Escherichia coli strains producing shiga toxins in separate populations of cattle and sheep. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998; 63: 2175- 2180.

    27) Kapur V, Sischo WM, Greer RS, Whittam TS, Musser J. Molecular population genetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from cows. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 376- 380.

    28) Peigramhari SM, Vaillancourt JP, Wilson RA, Gyles CL. Characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from avian cellulitis. Avian Dis 1995; 39: 116 -124.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]